Premises liability is the legal responsibility a property owner or occupier has when someone is injured on their property due to an unsafe or dangerous condition. In Kansas and Missouri, property owners have a legal duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions for visitors. When they fail to do so,and someone gets hurt as a result, the injured person may be entitled to compensation.
Common premises liability cases include slip and fall accidents, inadequate security leading to criminal attacks, falling objects, structural defects, dog bites, and exposure to toxic substances like radon or mold.
To succeed on a premises liability claim in Kansas or Missouri, you generally need to show four things:
What counts as “should have known” is often the key battleground in these cases. Our attorneys investigate thoroughly to establish that the hazard existed long enough or was recurring enough that a reasonable property owner would have addressed it.
Common situations that may qualify include:
If you were hurt on someone else’s property and believe the condition that caused your injury had existed for some time, you may have a claim. Contact MRH Injury Law for a free consultation.
Your first priority is always your health and safety. Beyond that:
Contact MRH Injury Law as soon as possible so we can preserve evidence before it disappears.
The statute of limitations or the deadline to file a lawsuit varies by state and by the type of case. Generally, personal injury claims in Missouri must be filed within five years, while Kansas allows two years. However, there are important exceptions that can shorten or sometimes extend these deadlines, particularly when government-owned property is involved or when the injured party is a minor.
Do not wait to find out. Valuable evidence like surveillance footage, witness memories and physical hazards can disappear quickly. Contact an attorney as soon as possible after your injury.
Every case is unique, but MRH Injury Law pursues every available form of compensation, including:
How much you recover depends on the severity of your injuries, the strength of the liability evidence, whether the responsible party can pay, and where your case must be filed. Read more about the top 5 things that affect case value at kansascityinjuryfirm.com.
You may still be able to recover compensation even if you were partly at fault. Kansas follows a modified comparative fault rule, limiting recovery to plaintiffs who are less than 50% at fault. Missouri follows a pure comparative fault rule, allowing recovery regardless of your percentage of fault, though your compensation will be reduced by your share of responsibility.
Insurance companies routinely try to assign blame to injured victims to reduce or eliminate their payouts. Our attorneys investigate cases carefully to push back on unfair fault assignments.
Yes, in many cases. If a property owner failed to provide reasonable security measures and that failure allowed a crime to occur, they can be held legally responsible for your injuries. This is known as a negligent security or crime victim case.
Property owners including landlords, hotels, bars, parking garages, apartment complexes, and retail stores have a duty to protect lawful visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When prior crimes have occurred on or near the property and the owner failed to respond with adequate security, that inaction can constitute negligence.
Crime victim cases often arise from:
The key question is whether the crime was foreseeable, meaning there was prior criminal activity at or near the location that the property owner knew or should have known about.
No. Your civil claim against the property owner is separate from any criminal case against the perpetrator. You do not need a criminal conviction or even an identified suspect to pursue a negligent security claim. Civil cases use a lower standard of proof (“preponderance of the evidence”) than criminal cases (“beyond a reasonable doubt”).
MRH Injury Law has successfully recovered multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements in crime victim cases where the perpetrator was never prosecuted.
Strong crime victim cases are built on evidence showing the crime was foreseeable and the property owner failed to act. This typically includes:
Our attorneys investigate aggressively and have the resources to hire investigators, security experts, and reconstruction specialists when needed.
Security negligence, also called negligent security, occurs when a property owner or business fails to implement reasonable security measures to protect visitors, tenants, or customers from foreseeable harm. It is a subset of premises liability law.
Examples include a bar with a history of fights failing to hire adequate security staff, an apartment complex with broken gate locks that allows unauthorized access, or a hotel with a known crime problem that fails to install adequate lighting or cameras.
The law does not mandate a specific checklist. Instead, property owners must take security precautions that are reasonable given the nature of the property and the foreseeability of criminal activity. Factors courts consider include:
Common reasonable security measures include adequate lighting, working locks and access controls, security cameras, trained security personnel, and emergency communication systems.
Security negligence cases frequently involve:
High-traffic properties in areas with documented criminal activity carry heightened responsibility to protect their visitors and tenants.
Our attorneys build security negligence cases by showing that criminal activity was foreseeable and that the property owner’s failure to act was unreasonable. This typically involves:
Insurance companies argue these crimes were unforeseeable “acts of third parties” to avoid liability. Our job is to prove otherwise and we have a track record of doing exactly that.
We have taken numerous premises liability cases, including crime victim and security negligence cases to jury trial. In our 40+ years of combined experience, we’ve learned that someone else is usually responsible when you’re hurt on their property. We dig deep to find out who by hiring investigators, conducting depositions, recreating scenes, and retaining industry experts.
We frequently take cases rejected by other law firms and settle them for millions of dollars. We are not a high-volume churn-and-burn firm. We take cases we believe in and invest significant time and attention into each one.
MRH Injury Law works on a contingency fee basis. That means you pay nothing upfront, and we only get paid if we recover compensation for you. This ensures that our financial interests are completely aligned with yours. We don’t succeed unless you do.
Some cases resolve in a few months. Others may take a year or more depending on the complexity of liability, the severity of injuries, and whether litigation is required. Serious injury cases, particularly crime victim and security negligence matters often involve extensive investigation and expert testimony that take time to develop properly.
A longer timeline in a serious case is usually part of protecting your recovery, not a drawback. Quick settlements are often far below what a case is truly worth. Our goal is always to maximize your compensation, not to close files quickly.
If you were injured on someone else’s property because of an unsafe condition or because inadequate security allowed a crime to occur, you may have a strong claim, even if other attorneys have turned you down.
MRH Injury Law frequently takes cases rejected by other firms and settles them for millions of dollars. Use our “Do I Have a Case?” tool or contact us for a free initial consultation.
Connect with compassionate people and aggressive litigators. We will help you uncover your best case and maximum compensation.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By clicking “Accept”, closing this message or continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies.